Theocratism

= Theocratism: "Ethneticalist Theocracy" = Theocratism is arguably the first example and form of government. originally intended to be the main ideology. until it was revised and once again made new into the form of  Ethneticalism.  in its raw form it was argued to simply be just an exact copy of a Theocracy. the earliest product of  Crestor Hobb's  Ambitions. The Theocratic Republic is the most ideal form of a Religiously based Ethneticalist government. Arguing for the enhancement of a theocracy to a position of absolute power. but would still have to cooperate and be backed by a small chancellery. and a cabinet of Ministers. upholding a republic based image to comply with it. simply put a ''' "Constitutional Theocracy." ''' The theocratic republic would have in its simplest form. been like that of a Capitalist theocracy. with some extra steps added in. like the formation of an Electoral chancellery with a life long or possibly shorter term. backed by a small cabinet of ministers. and the addition of a minor senate based political government made to suggest and add laws. the Theocratic republic in its rawest form is simply an Ethneticalist government type. with the backwards logic that the leader is straight up appointed by god. and is declared to be by godly people. Crestor was so enthusiastic he would eventually set out to form and establish an army of similarly thinking people. to form a "Theocratic nation." somewhere within the world of Rathnir. but this sadly would however fail. as many people would wind up rejecting his ideas. as something coarse and unoriginal.

Crestor's vision was set on improving the concept of a completely religious/ideologically enforced government. But many forms of "theocracies" existed throughout Rathnir, Eldham, etc. as a result of which caused his idea to not be seen as relatively new. and had some added concepts to just make it look new all together. this lead to a heavy emphasis of rejection towards Crestor's beliefs. and enlightened him to what an new ideology should relatively be made into. it laid out the ground work of his earlier expertise and experiments. and enlightened him to delve deeper into ideological research. taking a look at his version of "theocratism" and comparing it to other ideologies. like  Xeroism  (communism), Fascism/National Socialism, and Capitalism. and though his first idea was not all too original. and was all simply put snagged ideas from theocracies and nationalist governments. it lead him to discover the possibility of discovering  Ethneticalism.  an truly new and original idea. with an completely unthought of economic policy, and not so entirely unoriginal political policy. but yet also having an unusual twist to it.

Crestor would come to see Theocratism, or the concept of the ''' "Theocratic Republic." ''' as simply an much smaller insignificant portion of a greater contemplation on the concepts of "How a government should function." and would come to create the much vaster concept of  Ethneticalism.  Which in turn would allow him to conclude the possibility of the ''' "Ethneticalist Theocracy." ''' Which is simply put the upgrade and difference to an ordinary theocracy. in which unlike it simply just being ordained leadership, and a Religious figurehead representing everything. the theocracy would simply be a "servant of improvement." a watchful eye over the people, and a representative not associated with the theocracy. like a President or Prime-Minister. who would simply be a "perfect leader who would be enforced to be perfect by the theocracy." essentially. a theocracy where the leader is not chosen by god. but chosen to become an ultimate servant of the gods themselves. The theocracies power can then either be limited or concentrated as they like. as Crestor saw that in order to cope against other ideologies. Ethneticalism should be lenient. and have room for diversity. as no Ethneticalist society will always be absolutely the same.

Crestor would end his focus entirely on the theocratic republic concept though. as he saw the vaster potential. Ethneticalism could also benefit simply just a moralist & secularist nation as well. but for the most part. Theocratism, or the ''' "Ethneticalist Theocracy." ''' would remain to exist as one of the minor products of his discovery. a purely religious government that is willing to be lenient and not have an Pope as its supreme ruler.

Economic Policy:
The difference between crestor now current idea of an Ethneticalist Economy. was once originally just simply put a  "Nationalist Market"  economy. where capitalism would reign free, strengthened, and unregulated. he saw the errors within this later and would revise it within Ethneticalism itself. but the main concept in its original form would simply try and argue that the government would have free reign to request resources from its citizens and take freely from the civilian market. in times of war and etc. to bolster its own strength. only to subsidize it with currency. or to return what has been taken in full. Or should the civilians be going through hard times the government would be expected to assist with the troubling dilemma. only to be repaid with increased taxes and other profitable means later. In which case though. it would simply be Capitalism with extra steps. this unregulated greed would later help crestor notice the root cause of all his corruption that remained within his ideology and address the issue by bluntly saying that the economy should simply be regulated and controlled by an external entity. that being the Theocracy and an appointed financial agency and class in itself.

that Capitalism and socialism alone is not enough simply to function. such a market is simply impossible to be expected to exchange fairly with the government as the enforcers. rather the enforcers must come from an higher order then even the Federal governments themselves. Regardless this remains one of the defining traits of Theocratism & the original  Theocratic Republic  design that crestor intended.

a government under ''' "National Marketism." ''' was simply argued to have a fair exchange policy. where both the federal government and what the people owned would be represented by separate markets. and both would inter exchange between one another fairly. supporting both, and yield at the same time growth between them. One would not simply be expected to overpower the other and the third entity being the theocracy. would be expected to step in should negotiations fail between both parties. and to prevent a conflict between the two.

in the end it was also an angle sought to maintain Crestor's one fascinated concepts. Nationalism. he felt like the addition of the concept of National Marketism. would simply encourage the state to be absolutely loyal to its armed forces. and consequentially its leaders. without the ideals of Fascism, and throwing blame and the need to argue to improve the face of the country to back it up. It would simply argue that if a leader is doing good the need to argue for to elect someone else should a shorter term limit be demanded when the nation was formed would simply be out of the question. as long as Crestor or said leader should continue to succeed in their political agenda and movements to appease the populace. should his plan have or haven't worked remains a mystery, as Crestor had simply failed to form the theocracy and therefore failed to ever discover if National Marketism could have actually worked.