Theocratism



=  Ethneticalism: The Basics  = Ethneticalism is the founding principles of an man named  Crestor Harks,  who went out on a journey seeking to establish an philosophy and "code of governance" for humanity and all manner of creatures within the world of Rathnir and beyond. Ethneticalism unlike his prior focus of "theocratism" expands on the philosophy to include multiple new possibilities and differences from the traditional formation of "theocratic" based forms of government.

Ethneticalism argues for the creating of a government. Bound by the rules of ideological guidance and principles. such of that is ethics, morals, and the majority beliefs of society rather that be the guiding concepts of a religion, or simply an economic policy and ideological belief. However! Unlike that of a formal and traditional Theocracy. which argues that "the leader is to believed to be appointed by the gods themselves, or that the most radical or upholding of ideological figures should inherit power." Ethneticalism argues that "Through Knowledge of their beliefs. a great leader can be simply be judged and placed into power by the people. so long as they uphold a good and religious/ideologically perfect image within the eyes of the state & its people."

In English, it argues that unlike "Theocracy" where an leader through religious texts must be appointed by a god themselves. or must be a member of the church, etc. leadership must be appointed through the means of "simply having an character that through training can appease the people & its institutions." that anyone can inherit the godly/ideological qualities to lead. and must simply be monitored and groomed to uphold a position of power. rather that is simply through electoral means or through simply being the strongest and most individuating. as long as it is in accordance with a societies morals, and majority code of law & ethics. it can be approved.

And that through this leadership, a form of Ideological council, should exist to monitor the economic, and sometimes political ratifications of both the federal government and its people. to ensure that the people themselves are upholding strengthening characteristics encouraged by their god, or simply their scientific reasoning and morals that exist within their secularist ideologies. not so much in the form of a "pope" or "theocracy/ideological figurehead." but through a committee of individuals that study and practice what they follow. as it argues no man is perfect. and all things with consciousness are flawed. but flaws can be mediated with correction.

Therefore. the leader simply does not "have the right to rule because god/our ideological founder told us so." it is "our leader is given power, because he has shown the greatest promise in being an upstanding character of Morality & godly morals. and thus, with the approval and guiding hand of our (religious or ideological) committee. he can be forged into the great divine leader.

Economic Policies:
The Economic polices of an Ethneticalist state. is simply put to have an representative state, along side an empowering ideological committee (Example: "a religious Patriarchy.") to guide the economy. they must set up a separate economy where the banks, money, and everything, especially in terms of transactions. are monitored by the "religious/ideological" banking system. these bankers often referred to by their own titles (Example: "The Boyars" ) who operate the bunks and help influence the financial system. the addition of "morality marketing" enables these bankers to monitor a business and do things like "fluctuate its stock values based on how good the business is keeping with religious/ideological laws." or can simply set taxations and encourage religiously/ideologically acceptable behavior. this is done simply to mediate the effects of corruption. and minimize the potentially hazardous outcomes that comes with encouraging inappropriate behavior. How this could be done is through a variety of methods. like manually filing "tax returns" or simply put. "having your citizens manually write down and return a report on expenses & gains to an "banking/government office." (possibly through the use of books.) to avoid having to pay fines. or etc.

Our Difference in Views:
Ethneticalist's would argue that the preservation of "Morality" among public and state owned business's are to be maintained. ''' this does not however argue for Socialism. as a socialist state is to be avoided! ''' otherwise you wind up with pure "Marxist thinking" which most Ethneticalist's would argue is the total opposite of their belief system. they do not argue for "the governments absolute control over everything, and distributing it equally and fairly for all." Ethneticalist believe that such a system is prone to corruption, and is prone to manipulation of politics, and gives the government to much strength and power. by law, it also promotes political figures to have everything and be absolutely greedy. Marxism lies, it creates greed for the impoverished communities. it creates corruption in the lowest forms of society.

It also however argues against unregulated capitalism. Capitalism promotes evil corruption as well to spread, and it prompts greed to march unrapidly. arguing that the individual welfare and "those that work for what they gained are entitled to keep all that they have earned." an Ethneticalist society. would argue that also not giving unto the poor and your fellow man, or simply being entitled to be in control completely of what you earn. is the grounds for a negative outcome. where the impoverished die in droves y the thousands. and the rich live long and fat lives. profiting off of substance abuse and "passion & pleasure" of horrible things.

And what is our difference with ''' "Nationalist Marxism?" ''' simply put, the se so called "Nationalist's" are no better versions of socialist then the Marxists alone. only they argue that the betterment of their image and nationality. through the absolute devotion to their countries prowess, politics, and militaries. is nothing short of simply saying. "yes you will give everything to that state graciously. and expect nothing back. but you do so knowing your bettering your cause." it is simply supplying one mans greed with the knowledge that yes. your own betterment is not the ambition or the goal. it is simply the false guarantee of progress to that goal. they are blinded. blinded to where nationalism should be placed. not in the State itself, but in the morals of the state. rather then vying for National Socialism! one should strive for  "Zealous Nationalism"  or the betterment of his own ''' "Ideological Radicalism." '''

Ethneticalist's argue for  "Guided Economics"  argues for the preservation of a ''' "Morality Economy." '''  Rather then "we all eat from the same suspicious stew bowl." or "give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a life time." We simply argue that "The Poor are guided. the rich are made generous, and the politically devout are made Holy."

The government shouldn't strive to own and distribute everything, nor should the people be refrained from owning things, but nor should they be permitted to buy into careless consumerism, or strive to use their money on "questionable indulgences" that could make the country look horrible. '''The dominate role of the "committee" in the system. is to watch both the federal government, and the people. and maintain both of their economies, and Ideological/spiritual image.''' the Committee itself can not be permitted to own nor distribute anything. but it can set regulations, like encourage better lives and taxation amongst citizens that hold exemplary religiously/ideologically acceptable behavior. And to encourage its electoral and government officials to uphold good behavior and habits with the guarantees and promises of potentially furthering their own political career. And risk the termination of state employment or leadership. or decline of their wellbeing's should they choose to defy their lives. or indulge in "unsavory" practices.

with this in the society's mind. people are in good hands, making lawful and good hearted practices, such as not blackmailing your neighbors, not engaging in adulatory or cheating on your "in game spouse." etc. are all firm and solid examples of what can be achieved in an purely ''' Ethneticalist government. ''' stride hard to search and expose your leaders for corruption and evil will. bring down those that do not agree with your morality. Only through sheer devotion. and the strong embracement of "the way we think is right" can strength truly be found in our society. "If intense bigotry (non-acceptance of how others think or believe.) is how one society exhibits strength, then the finding of acceptance. not hatred. is how progression is made." let your religious and cultural scholars be the backbone of your progression. and if your leaders, bankers, or political figures do not agree with that. then what good are they? they will promote corruption and weakness to thrive, they will blind fully make moves to change how you and your neighbors think, they may even encourage unjustified and horrible purges of your beliefs. and all you can do is sit by and watch as the people in power, laugh at your sudden defeat for they do not find any sympathy, but pure enjoyment. in the denial of ones motivation to exist in the world.

Let your state be guided by the principles of coordinated Progression through a mixed devotion of science and ideological/theological thinkers. the committee is more than your advisors. they are the backbone of your society. your representative may be your leader, but through the sheer and absolute devotion no one will be able to challenge the people or the concept of the ''' "pure functional government." ''' so long as your ideological & religious organizations are the backbone of your societies. Never let them argue who is rightfully meant to lead through divine rule, but simply agree that "innocent until proven guilty. this character has shown great care in practicing our ways. and has earned his place amongst the list of our former leaders.'